/lit/ - Literature

>>2632220
>anal devastation
>no counterargument

You know what's sad? When I did my degree (in real science), I supplemented it by reading the greats, for free, from the library. In this fashion I was able to touch my mind to some of the greatest geniuses of history -- the closest thing possible to attending a lecture by them. I became a better person for the reading, by hearing what they had to say (which is why people wrote it down).

All art and writing is a communication from an artist or thinker to us, the audience. The whole of deconstructionism and indeterminacy is a massive logical fallacy -- it is argumentum ad hominem elevated to a discipline. I mean, "consider the source" is a logical fallacy. What you guys have been taught to do is consider ONLY the source. That's sad.

I became educated for free -- you are clearly actually paying some washed-up old radical to vaccinate your mind against the collected wisdom of centuries of civilization, and that's a bitter shame.