/lit/ - Literature

>>2897775
You haven't proven your first point right.
I don't know much clearer I can be about this.

Take a look at this picture.

You can not start arguing another point until you prove yours.
>You can not do that because it is not an argument and you're simply proving yourself wrong.
You. Can. Not. Do. That. My. 16. Year. Old. Friend.

>>2279599
>Pic related
Take a look at the first two points.
Until you learn how to debate properly, we're through here.

>>2279643
>Though if you studied for nine years without moving beyond simplistic dichotomies like "religion vs. logic"
Me deciding to focus the main point of this discussion on that particular 'debate' (religion vs logic) is all you got from there?
Dear lord. Take a look at the link I previously posted, it should epitomize what lead me to think like this.
>I'm not sure that your studies were worthwhile
Oh, but they were. They come in handy putting people like you on their place.

>Unless you believe in mind-body dualism, free will is illusory anyway. I'm sure there's more to your non-belief than your trouble with the idea of omniscience.
Of course there is more. Since I'm addicted to studying, reading and so on, my route eventually lead me to biology. Without free will a, let's say, computer would be able to predict every single event in the universe. Perhaps what I'm saying is too complicated for you to understand, but I'm sure you'll get there...eventually.