/lit/ - Literature

>>16776709
>material reality has a local maxima for efficiency
Importing Africa into the West is not efficient in any sense.

>>16776778
Truth.

>>13272474
Only the anglos hold to a firm left/right dichotomy. Don't ask me why.

>>9574223
> moving the goalposts this hard

Now you're critiquing immigration and not Islam.

You're a retard and you can't even state the vague bullshit you mean, because deep down, you're exactly like a tumblr left liberal idiot. You act on emotions and not rational arguments. You see something and in your head you go "Yay, whites!" or "Boo, shitskins!" in the same way a feminist landwhale in her head goes "Yay, equality" or "Boo, inequality" and neither can give a rational formulation for their arguments that isn't totally contradictory. You have the mind of a 12 year old girl.

>>9574252
> Islamophilic

That's your word, not mine, retard. In case you forgot.
>>9574165

read

Pierre Manent
Carl Schmitt
Cornelius Castoriadis
Alain de Benoist
Peter Sloterdijk

also
neo-marxist Paul Piccone and Telos Press might be interesting to you:

>Desperate to locate anything resembling a revolutionary subject to carry out the projected historical task — beyond a few pockets of intellectual elites — the Left has tended to latch onto whatever segment of society seemed at odds with the system, no matter how contradictory their political objectives might have been. At various times during the past three decades it has embraced women demanding universal equality, feminists vindicating gender particularity, civil rights demonstrators seeking to abolish segregation, black nationalists advocating separatism, upwardly mobile Afro-American professionals defending affirmative action, homosexuals fighting, first, ostracism, and seeking protected minority status later, illegal immigrants, farm workers, the homeless — any group complaining about something. Far from resulting in any ”rainbow coalition” able to challenge the logic of the system, such an opportunistic, indiscriminate approach may have resulted in a few tenured positions for Left ideologues scavenging ”cultural studies” for real or imagined subversive elements, but it has destroyed whatever there may have been of a coherent Left perspective. Thus it is no accident that the Left’s main goal today is merely ”inclusion” in a system no longer deemed in need of radical changes, rather than ushering in a qualitatively different society untainted by the structural flaws responsible, among other things, for the new fons et origo malorum: ”exclusionary mechanisms” keeping particular individuals and groups out of the mainstream.