/lit/ - Literature

>>2258115

>So by "not acceptable" you mean "not acceptable to me."

Yes, of course. When ever a person says not acceptable, by default it means it's not acceptable TO HIM.

>Not true. Einstein did not "reason" his way to the theory of relativity.

Einstein did reason his way to the theory of relativity, he did not use mysticism to explain it. Reason is the path, intuition is the guide, mysticism is fog. To get to a scientific conclusion, you follow the path with your intuition, sometimes you go offtrack and wander into the fog, but your goal is to see where the path ends.

>Not what I imagine you'd accept as objective, of course not.

What proof you'd accept as objective to prove their existence, if your objectively differs from mine? Do you truly think they all "exist in this reality we both live in, in a sense that they affect this reality we both live in directly, with their own actions", and you can somehow interact with them?