/lit/ - Literature

>>6114089
Maybe it's blatent to you, it isn't to me. I don't surround myself with cartoony panties, so my frame of reference is obviously not suited to look at it like that.

Pic related is a ceiling corner, which is what I saw it as, the stripes in the wite can be seen as pages in a pink opened book as well. The grey penetrating the pink was a bit of a stretch into the symbolic, but it's not an invalid idea, and to go ''hurr retard u must be autismal for not seeing panties!!'' is rather childish.

So just because something is obvious to you, does not make it obvious to everyone. If you are used to different styles of art, or if you simply look at certain things you will find them quicker when looking at other things.
It honestly took you saying they were panties before it even came into my mind, I simply did not think of it.

But I don't know why I'm still trying to defend myself or explain this to you, when you've already shown you're incapable of acting even remotely civilized. I won't expect much more than a ''ur tard ;-)'' as a response by now, which you might even consider, purely for the sake of me having mentioned it.