/lit/ - Literature

>>18354875
The elephant abuse webms dont really involve abusing the elephant, its more the elephants abusing other things

>>17404444
dunno

>>17160527
Yeah i have to say, those are the only two things i can fault her for.
The thing is, Houellebecq is a lite version of Céline, and the girl in question is trying to write like Céline as well. There's no shame in that, he changed French literature with his style, after all, but that's simply the way it is.
I like how she calls him a hoarder of common sense; i think Houellebecq himself would agree with that. He said that the point of his writing is to find the wounds in a society, and then press deep.
I still think she could've ditched the Aristotle namedrop, but the French terms are fitting in this case.

>>16897938
There simply arent that many books about it, nor is there much surviving from that period (obviously). So it's just not an attractive topic literature-wise.

>>15799697
Im unironically also a STEM PhD

>>15470329
It's almost all women.
You must understand that women are extremely intellectually deficient, and despite those 20th century feminist ideals, there's still a lizard brain calling the shots, and it loves to get grabbed by the neck and raped.
Im not saying you should become a psychopath, but at least become a psychopath when it comes to women.

Gimme more milkers and no one gets hurt.
But if ya dont post more milkers, we're gonna have a fucking problem.