/lit/ - Literature

>>3277927
>What you advocate is not anarchism at all. Its very definition (regardless of branches or interpretations) implies lack of hierarchies.

Anarchism is the lack of a state.

>You also keep using words like "banned" when referring to other anarchist practices, when that is also ruled out by definition. Hierarchies would naturally become extinct. If violent coercion has to be used in any context, it is not anarchism.

So if I want to murder my whole town in an anarcho-communist society, no force would be used against me?

>The need for the use of force to control undesired behaviour among individuals is an indicator that the state of mind needed to establish a true anarchist society has not been reached

This is just pure delusion. Do communists actually believe that all behavior they don't like is because of conditioning that needs to be undone? It's almost like they completely deny facts and science concerning human behavior.

ran butt