/lit/ - Literature

/lit sci fit/
I also reject the full power set axiom, and of course avoid LEM whenever reasonably possible

>>13466790
okay, then Pimp by
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iceberg_Slim
https://youtu.be/YaynP-saNxY

>>13093638
Is this any sort of canon?
Why would he have a central role? That sounds too materialist/rationalist of an answer, mhh

>>13010423
Donno bro, I'm not responsible for any other Kant threads.
I suppose my route comes from reading into German Idealism recently and also to get into the cypher capitalist shit, which supposedly ties back to it.

I read the first 150 pages of the critique about 10 years ago but stopped at his characterization of time and space as innate to the human mind.

I dated a philosphy student who wrote her Master thesis on Deleuze and generally, naturally read quite a bit.
But she's more interested in going on conferences and talking with other academics about the latest craze in philosphy academia than engaging in the edgy /lit/ meme philosphers that I do. Might be related to the fact that she's a staunch lefty. She's fucking hot though, so it's not like she doesn't have dem bois at her feet also she's desperately trying to really classically fall in love and I can't give her that for various reasons.
I'm 33 and mostly dating in the 18-22yo range too, so it's hard to find experienced readers.

I have a related, maybe even in some sense inverted question to the OP:
How do I stop wanting and trying to convince people of things.

I'm already moderately good at selecting what affects me and so, in some cases, don't really give a shit and can take things more "at face value".
I don't want to fall for the renaissance man / objectivism meme, but I'm sure that there are things where not engaging is healthies and more effective. Not letting people stop you by them stating contrarian opinions. I think it also aids in getting following/compagning by just going on and ignoring critique that doesn't amount to more than "I don't like that."

Who've achieved a nice geniun not giving a shit level - and I don't mean cynics comedians who think life sucks types.

Marx analysis of capitalism and in particular the theory of value isn't Marxism.

Marxism is the idea that the natural and best way to reach Communism (stateless and currencyless society) is best reached by first gathering most power in the state and also kill off all non-defecting capitalists.

>alternative to communism that isn't just reactionary 'grug no like change'
What's communism to you that you characterize it like that? What do you want to get at.

https://youtu.be/DcQJYXYGSPk

Zizek is more clear lately, if he wants to be

I don't know any novel that I'd like more than some of the philosophy books I like.
They just don't affect me in any substantial way, I'd read them only for the perspective and philosophical content, and so reading direct thoughts is more to the point. I never got good at knowing what good prose really means.

>>11917279
Safeguard how?

Thanks for the link, but half-assedly reading it, it seems like another experiemental blog. Should I put energy into that or are you trolling?