/lit/ - Literature

>>14001694
I enjoyed it but haven't read the last one yet and will need to reread the others before that because I forgot a lot. It basically has a little bit of everything (politics, magic, adventure, demons etc) . It's not groundbreaking but not bad. Just a pretty generic sword and sorcery series. I'd recommend it if you enjoy stuff like cradle and other amazon tier books but if you're some fart smelling purist that only reads stuff like malazan than stay away.

>>12911047
Doubt it. I'm a pleb like them
>>12911063

>>11213066
benjamin ashwood by AC cobble. regular dude gets thrown into a group and travels with them. Magic, swords, demons, a little bit of politics. Personally I think it's one of those series where the author improves on everything with each new book so if you enjoy the first even a little I'd keep reading. I think it's somewhere in between YA and things like GoT and mistborn (even though I haven't read either of those but they seem like "mature" fantasy).

Everything in this thread is old because old = good right? How is this even a general if you just circlejerk over the same 10 fantasy books written from the 60's lol.

Here's an actual recent series that's pretty damn good.