[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22796818 [View]
File: 6 KB, 220x221, IMG_2703.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22796818

/lit/, /his, and /sci/
The holy trinity of pseudo intellectual faggotry

>> No.21933051 [View]
File: 6 KB, 220x221, 1676791876017177.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21933051

>>21928368
Nietzsche completely destroyed this retard. All ideas are instrumental. If your philosophy makes you hate life, your philosophy is bad. Simple as. If Schopenhauer was smarter, he would've been Lev Shestov.

>> No.21775124 [View]
File: 6 KB, 220x221, 7044673670.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21775124

>>21775012
>Cogito already presupposes many things that it cannot account for on its own grounds, such as time over which experience is happening
This is all irrelevant. Presuppositions require a pre-supposer (consciousness) to do the presupposing. To even presuppose would just be another confirmation of my own 'I am-ness'.
>such as time
Doubting temporality requires a consciousness to do the doubting. This is more confirmation of the self evidence and proof of the fundamental nature of consciousness.
>the ability of words to describe this reality
Completely irrelevant. The experiencer knew he was experiencing before there even were such things as natural language. I myself knew I was experiencing before I knew the natural language to elaborate it.
>the laws of logic
Irrelevant. You don't need to know 'the laws of logic' to know you are a being which is being. The 'I am' is the salient concept thing here. Thinking is ONE of the things that 'I ams' do. One need not even appeal to ones own specific type of intellection to know of ones being-ness. One realizes that the experiencer is experiencing even in a dream.

>> No.21644486 [View]
File: 6 KB, 220x221, 7044673670.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21644486

>>21642575
>have morning sex
>Read and have sex
>Read and have Sex
Not going to make it with that much cooming. You will never be a serious person and it can be said with certitude ESPECIALLY with regard to intellection that you will never attain a high level of thought. The quality of consciousness is directly inversely proportional to the frequency of cooms. In other words, the more cooms one experiences, the less consciousness illumination one will have. So think of it as a lamp situation. The semen, or technically the spirit power that the semen is just a matter based icon representation of, is the oil of the lamp. If this is empty, the flame of the illumination of the mind is extinguished. The flesh wars with the spirit. That is not to say that one should NEVER experience this experience of coitus, but that IS to say it should be minimized and should be of a non fornicative variety, ie within marriage. You will also suffer physiologically eventually from this lack of judiciousness with regard to sexual energy dispensation. So basically, contrary to the message asserted in the commonly repeated meme, have sex LESS. You are on the road to perdition.

>> No.21501576 [View]
File: 6 KB, 220x221, 1648808822428.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21501576

>>21501327
If you give a man a fish you feed him for a day, if you teach him to fish you push him into the eternal came cycle of ever increasing pain and suffering.

>> No.21222122 [View]
File: 6 KB, 220x221, 1647044673670s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21222122

>>21222059
>No one is saying that we even need a single entity to explain the universe's creation
I am saying that. See here
>>21221936
The universe could not have caused itself. It would have to have existed before it's own beginning to have done this. This is illogical. This is the type of illogical roads you have to go down when you deny that there was a creator of this physical reality. The best would just at least accept deism so as to avoid dissonance. The argument is not defeatable. And it's not even my argument, so I am not being arrogant. Some entity which has the attributes of beginninglessness and the ability to create physical universes such as the one we are immersed exists. This is a deductively valid argument. Do what you will with this info.

>> No.20704800 [View]
File: 6 KB, 220x221, 1643647974814.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20704800

>>20703306
Yeah, not reading this pissbook, sorry

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]