/lit/ - Literature

>>15251886
Am I retarded if I think this is really good?

>>15200036
There is such a thing as lexical vs impressionistic thinking and I guess you'll be far on the left of that spectrum, probably with all the other autists.
That's what I hope all this is and the NPC thing isn't true, though the more I meet people the more i'm starting to realize there's people who just don't think at all.

>>14854252
As I "understand" it, and do forgive any mistakes, God's operations are distinct from his actions without causing a divide in the divine essence. Just like how real distinctions of the persons in the Holy Trinity do not cause a "split" of God into three parts. It's distinction without division (something any even remotely sensible Christian already accepts as possible).

Knowing this, we can share in God's uncreated Love while in this life without falling into degeneracy by claiming a participation/union with the Divine Essence, which would be blasphemy and idolatry.
>>14854284
This. One simply knows it noetically instead of ""figuring it out"".
>>14854256
Because it is revealed to us by God, whereas the RCC notion is constructed from the ground up using faulty pagan reasoning with "Trinity" tacked on at the end.

Should I write in English or in my native tongue?