/lit/ - Literature

you are never gonna make it if you go off start naming individual pseud cases in [current year]
basically >>21053140 isnt wrong
what you need is a process, a method, an algorithm that works at scale..


i like to filter pseuds out by using predictive power
if a work has no predictive power, its pseud
since 99.9% of philosophy has no predictive power, it is safe to discard 99.9% of it as pseudo intellectual >>>/x/ trash with 0 academic or other value
psychology, sociology, political science, management, business, law, stuff with studies in its name, all this crap has as much predictive power as gypsy fortune telling, and is therefore also garbage that no one with triple digit iq can respect or take seriously

>mfw neurotic liberals attribute deep philosophical thoughts to 85 iq rappers the same way that they attribute the retarded actions of their cats to some complex imaginary feline thought process
>mfw liberals will never be loved by blacks or their cats

IF YOU'RE USING THE WORD IN ENGLISH, THEN FUCKING ANGLICIZE THE PRONUNCIATION

HOW HARD IS THIS TO UNDERSTAND