/lit/ - Literature

>>13445579
>What do you mean by this?
That was the last volley, so I'd recline and explain:
I see dromology as escaping the perfunctory [background radiation] circuits of life in the specific way you established a while back: life-as-death (Kantian I-judgement, etc) and the undeadness of virtualisation. Not good; "Undead Nietzsche" doesn't quite cover it.
>Deontotrinitarian "squelching of interpassive communification"
Have you ever met a Jesuit? They're fiercely autistic, some of them: Father Garrpe is like a proto-postmodern "subjectification with NEET-like characteristics."
>escaping the evental circumferences of all it's explosive [expansive] "cartesian conperimeters" unto spatiotemporality.
I feel like this is self-explanatory, maybe I'm erring into "too much iris" territory: Badiou describes his political exteriority as inevitable in the Maoist sense: subjects must abandon all "Western" or "Eastern" dialectics in order to integrate a full-causal mechanism of non-dialectical/naive monist revolution or "full-body-politic [E-]motion." It's autism as a political-economic analysis, a reductivist form of Maoism that is not at all incomparable to the turn Posadas makes from Trotskyism. "Leftism" has so many branches laden with that Platonic-Recursive fruit, it just fits in so sweetly as the "monoceros" of totalitarian ontologies.