/lit/ - Literature

>>12875238
>In erotic fiction what really gets the blood pumping down is the build-up, not an isolated blowjob.

woah...maybe you should buy the erotica then since the sex scene is at the end of chapter 2 and unlike the shitty porn you find online its actually structured and has a proper sense of character, regardless of being trashy porn designed to titillate. The screencap exists to show a random piece of the writing to show that I can objectively write functional, professional prose that isnt epic purple "style" wank. Its actually embarrassing that you lack self awareness to this degree and wrote up that complete dogshit post critiquing things that are not in the post you replied to and you couldnt possibly know about outside of retarded assumptions. Did you fucking think that one half page was the full erotica? Are you fucking retarded?

>presenting this as proof of your writing skills
brainlet, plebfiltered, never going to make it and retarded in general. You try to "write", I write.
>>12875254
The book isnt self aware. It has one character who makes references (mostly in prose) to things from our real life. The book is only postmodern in the objective sense that we literally are living in the postmodern time. Its also structured much more like a play/ screenplay so every scene is dead important and crystal focused, there isnt really any space to slip in some random completely unrelated thing involving books out of nowhere. An actual meme (particularly a term) thats hard to spot for anyone who isnt from /lit/ is easier to slide in