/lit/ - Literature

>U.G Krishnamurti rejected the very basis of thought and in doing so negated all systems of thought and knowledge. Hence he explained his assertions were experiential and not speculative – "Tell them that there is nothing to understand."
>Question: So you say that the mind doesn't exist. What does exist?
>UG: This [pointing to himself] is just a computer.

How based can one man be?

>U.G Krishnamurti rejected the very basis of thought and in doing so negated all systems of thought and knowledge. Hence he explained his assertions were experiential and not speculative – "Tell them that there is nothing to understand."
>Question: So you say that the mind doesn't exist. What does exist?
>UG: This [pointing to himself] is just a computer.

How based can one man be?

Get on his level

>He rejected the very basis of thought and in doing so negated all systems of thought and knowledge. Hence he explained his assertions were experiential and not speculative – "Tell them that there is nothing to understand."