/lit/ - Literature

I don't know what Stirnerites even want in threads like this. If you were a fundamentalist (I don't know anything about you so I can only argue per proxy against the book) you wouldn't participate in any such discussions since they are a violation of your dogma of the self as creative nothing. I would have no access to you, literally.

So, if you are here this means you are still on the fence. But what is it that you are unsure of? What needs explanation? I hear "prove him wrong, prove him wrong" in every thread. What do you want to hear? Stirner preemptively denies institutionalized value and the axioms of a common language.

Protip: That's a closed belief system. Like nihilism or materialism or psychological egoism. You can just deny, deny, deny all day long by inflating the definitions of what it means to have no meaning, nothing outside matter, no action that is not selfish respectively.

Do you think those "damn SJW" philosophers in Cambridge and Stanford or whatever shudder in fear when they hear Stirner's name? No, into the trash he goes because his philosophy is uninteresting and offers exactly -zero- accessible explanation of the world or anything. Zeeerooo. Ok?

Does that make sense?

???

I asked for philosophical works

Instead I got opinions and some Anglo fuck trying to shame me. I don't even write prose. Fuck you kevin.

Anglos explain this shit

>play doh
>Sockrat tease
>kahnt
>kahhhhhh[h]hhhhhhhnt
>neetchuh

Explain why you can't say Plah-toh, So-krah-tess, Neetsh-eh. Kant without the moronic aspiration.

No meme replies, I want to know, seriously. I'm not telling you to roll your R's or something. These are all within your current phonetic capacities. Why can you not pronounce things like normal people? Are you by any chance fucktarded?