/lit/ - Literature

>"A marriage proves its excellence by being able to put up with an occasional "exception.""

>"Nothing that women of significance do for their husbands, if they are men of renown and greatness, does more to make their lives easier than becoming the receptacle, as it were, of other people. Contemporaries tend to overlook many mistakes and follies and even actions of gross injustice in their great men if they can just find someone whom they can mistreat and slaughter as a true sacrificial animal in order to relieve their own feelings. Not infrequently, a woman finds within herself the ambition to offer herself for this sacrifice, and then the man can of course be quite content - provided that he is enough of an egoist to put up with having this sort of willing conducting rod for lightning, storms, and rain near him."

Was it really just satire?

>>16190024
>Nietzsche's elitism stems from his view that he is from a noble (master) bloodline and that morality is given by blood only, not something that is earned or worked for.
>i'm right because muh feelz
cringe

>>16136889
Nice cope. But who was the greater slave? Seneca was married and died in a great ritual. Nietzsche went mad from fucking gay prostitutes and died surrounded by people he hated.
How is the latter image better? And why is writing nature as a diseased cuckold okay? By Nietzsche's own account nature is nothing more than an immensity enslaved to itself, meaning that only the perspective is different, nothing essential.

>>15760409
>DEY WUZ JUS JELLY N SHEEEITT
The ultimate midwit.

>>12859029

>>12774850
The ultimate conclusion of NEETchuh.

>>12577115
Why, because he was a geneticuck?