/lit/ - Literature

>>19002417
don't call us libs, lib

>>19002437
good question. the standard answer is that you use planning and a dictatorship of the proletariat to do this. capitalism has many inefficiencies that go away when you don't bother with commodity production. but to be able to do this you need to be able to do calculation in kind, and you need decent quality data for said calculations. but once you do, you can yeet the market. me and some other cyberneticians are looking at using tools from linear algebra and AI to do this

>>18829116
>Hey commies, give me the best summation of your ideology since you love theory so much
"capitalism is a fuck" - karl marx

>I would like to see a list of goals for the communist world order
"from each according to ability, to each according to need"

>praxis on how you achieved/attempted to achieve them
now that's the question. personally I focus on the economic side. in-kind calculation can now be done with computers. we're in a position where the entire world economy can be fully planned, democratically even. look up cybernetics. read cockshott.

as for communism in general, let's dig a bit deeper. things we don't like:
* wage labour is exploitative
* capitalism is destroying the environment
* production is haphazard and mediocre
* people are forced to move to find better jobs, because of war, or more recently because of climate change

things commies tend to want:
* shorter work week
* large-scale production (more efficient)
* replacing markets with in-kind calculation (again, more efficient)
* international cooperation
* no wars
* no classes
* no money
* no states