/lit/ - Literature

>>18890356
Stirner never advocated for communism in his book, you retard. He was supporter of Smith and Say. He calls communism tyrannical and an empty theory that dwells too much on the moral piousness of "productive labor." Stirner is a strict nominalist who understands that the value of humans, or any concept we have, is uniquely attributed to the individual himself and his passions. Its so easy to discard Marx's non-sense when you realize your personal preferences guide your economic choices, and not the "inherent contradictions" of an "economic philosophy" or the machinations of a few men sitting in a room plotting against the worker - a schizophrenic pipedream. Marxism, like Communism, is just solipsism applied to economics. Away with your non-sense.