/lit/ - Literature

>>14797183
Close! Still founded on duality of subject/object. "God is in me, I am in God," and all that. This is truth at the level of the separate, individuated self, the little me. Why separate and distinguish? Clearer to say, "I am god. God is me." This is truth at the level of All That Is, of the big ego, the big me.

The creation, god, still has limitation: god must be. You, as unmanifest awareness, are beyond is-ness. At this 'level', god is 'trying' to reflect back to 'you' (undifferentiated awareness) what you are, which is the one infinite creator.

So yes, also no. Because human consciousness is only one level of consciousness. Rocks are conscious, they're simply a latent form of it. Rock life is best life. Animals and plants, too, are life, slightly more sophisticated, but not yet fully conscious or individuated. Wolves, for example, are a higher level of consciousness than a fish. There's more dynamism going on there.

If someone says this shit is boring it's because they don't know god/creation/the universe/all that is/everything-you-see-and-experience as all-consuming, transcendental love and ever-present connection reflecting back to you the magnificent beauty of infinity at every moment. God is the greatest drug dealer around -- first hit's always free, and then you spend the rest of your days getting your fix, hollowing out the little me to get more of the big me. Really, it puts the separate, angry, bitter, suffering egoic way of life to shame. Nothing compares to the kingdom of heaven as every day reality. Literally nothing.