/lit/ - Literature

>Qu'est ce que c'est que ça?
Thank us frogs for permanently defeating all literalist niggers in one sentence.

>>21394512
The rich have always been degenerates. They were already trying to look like trannies by the end of the 17th century.

Medicine just wasn’t advanced enough yet to give them the full option.

>>19753534
Chad kings also wore tights and high heels. I wouldn't advise you emulate them though. Social norms change.

>why yes I am a Christian, how could you tell?

>>13406485
The fucking smug arrogance of Christians
Satan must use your kind as his agents, thanks for pushing me away from this awful sounding "faith"
Good bye

What is it that makes Christians so arrogant and condescending? Any literature on this?

>>6279654
>implying the revolution wasn't a depiction of the failure of liberalism in 5 short years
I bet you call Marie Antoinette the Austrian Whore

Stereotypical rebellious posturing has become commodified and mainstream. Being an actual rebel these days would be to engage in counter-rebellion. So reactionarism. 4chan has always been the avant garde of edginess, and it shows in people adopting hyper-conservative attitudes and going as far as to venture into ideas like orthodox religion and monarchism and strict sexual mores, such as on /pol/ and /r9k/.

But ultimately a rebel is simply one who is at odds with the status quo. The content of this being at odds matters little.

I'm curious /lit/ who were the best writers who wrote in support of monarchies, preferably constitutional monarchies, in the face of republican ideas and revolutionaries?

Is absolute monarchy a viable form of government in this day and age?