/lit/ - Literature

>>12928821

>>10619532
Not every Adorno scholar is a fanboy, heideggerian and other schools of aesthetics are critique enough. It still doesn't change the fact that /lit/ is not the only place in which those guys are talked about, you uneducated swine.

>>10251725
>So? That's not even a contradiction to the premise. The grand common narrative stays everpowerful the same.
That wasn't in your definition. Stop moving the goalpost. Not once was this "common narrative" once mentioned.
>You can do that on general political subreddits just as well
That's because those are the main stream opinions. If you posted right-wing opinions you'd get downvoted which results in your views being hidden and therefore censored. A good test would be to go on any political reddit and search by controversial. Almost exclusively right-wing views. 4chan does not have such a sytem. You get called a faggot at worse.
>The nature and cause are irrelevant. Groupthink is groupthink.
Groupthink that cannot be questioned and is sysmetically enforced is completely different from groupthink that results due to lack of opposing users due to their lack of interest in engaging. At this very moment you can post whatever controversial views or opinions on /pol/ and you won't get censored. You're being disingenuous by making no distinction between the two as it's vital in the context of being an echo chamber or not even if the end result is the same.