/lit/ - Literature

>>16424007
no, it's a jewish lie, one of many

what philosophers do today's "leftists" use as their guides? it's obvious that they aren't influenced by post structuralism because while on the one side they cry that say gender is a social construct (which it is) they present their ways of looking at such issues as objectively true, something that's completely antithetical to post structuralism. so what philosophers/philosophies do they base all their contradictory rhetoric on? is it in large part judith butler? i haven't read her because she seems uninteresting to me but in general, from what I've seen, they all seem to quietly almost despise people like foucault and derrida, and almost none of them ever even mention guys like baudrillard and deleuze.

btw I'm not just talking about pic related, i also mean absolute idiots like adam connover, peter coffin and thought slime