/lit/ - Literature

>>20106294
>From the Blogpost
"Firstly, “Proof” here doesn’t mean anything like “the argument is true, therefore what the argument aims to prove is true”. It is rather the opposite. God is true, God is real, and therefore the argument works. The logic that undergirds Guenon’s and Schuon’s use of “proofs” is not that the proofs are perfect or infallible in themselves, indeed anyone can take apart an argument by its premises. Anyone can believe anything they want, no matter how illogical or contrary to experience it is. The logic of their use of proofs is instead based on “intellection”. They help, in Cutsinger’s words, to “see along” the ray of light they trace up to its source. It requires attention, mindfulness, and a willingness to know. In short, it requires faith. If you are not willing to be convinced, you won’t be, and it is not always immediate even if you want to be. People are different and there are different ways for different people to be convinced."

>retarded ape
See Pic