/lit/ - Literature

It's a surrogate activity

>fantasize all day at work about going home and writing
>go home
>write nothing

Reject Modernity
https://youtu.be/sl2--OHvxK4

>>20491517
blackpilled again. Its literally over

somebody please refute him, I'm tired of living with beliefs that are gonna put me on a watch list.

My personal
>Civilized to death
>Mutual aid
>Unabomber manifesto
>Tribe
>Against the grain
>John zerzan books
>On killing
>Humankind a hopeful story
>Psychological studys (mice utopia,monkeys that were separated,human aggression james prescott and others.

>detractors never read him
>everything he said is coming true
>still right in 2022
Why haven't you taken the tedpill?

>detractors don't actually read what he said
>detractors can only strawman
>hasn't been disproven by anyone
Many such cases

ITT: Juvenile pseudo-philosophers who have internet cult followings

Nobody has refuted what he wrote.

>His detractors never actually read a single thing he wrote
Many such cases.

>>19578133
It hasn't even begun.

>killed people for selling computers
>all his fanboys use computers

>>19396705
Ted has interesting things to say about psychology in his book

For once a great, informative and horrifying article. 300 IQ Ted K confirmed again as indisputably right on everything, and will be confirmed again when this last stand will probably fail. It's going to be impossible to restructure this shit even for China using brute force. It's probably going to get a few heads rolling once they touch the megacorps. The 1% has the resources to retaliate.
On the other hand, if this succeeds... I don't know if it will be better than what we are currently experiencing. How does the State decide which values are right? Sure I'd ban the digital crack and every other damaging thing but obviously they won't stop there.

Let us suppose that we had carried out production as human beings. Each of us would have, in two ways, affirmed himself, and the other person. (i) In my production I would have objectified my individuality, its specific character, and, therefore, enjoyed not only an individual manifestation of my life during the activity, but also, when looking at the object, I would have the individual pleasure of knowing my personality to be objective, visible to the senses, and, hence, a power beyond all doubt. (ii) In your enjoyment, or use, of my product I would have the direct enjoyment both of being conscious of having satisfied a human need by my work, that is, of having objectified man's essential nature, and of having thus created an object corresponding to the need of another man's essential nature … Our products would be so many mirrors in which we saw reflected our essential nature.

>blames his autism on highways and bridges
>regularly biked into town to buy candy
Why are there people who take this larper seriously?

Authors like pic rel?
>no zerzan
>no anprims
>no leftists

I was rereading Industrial Society and It's Future, and I noticed when Ted speaks of lefties as the power hungry types, who attempt to impose their beliefs and morals on others (which is correct), he does the exact same thing. He speaks of revolution and creation of a revolutionary movement, that would go on and impose his ideas and philosophy on others. He goes as far as predicting that violence will be unavoidable. So how do you differentiate between Ted and lefties when it comes to this? Would not he be then, by his own definition, a leftie?

Was he?

>>18913266
>tech bad

>>18913288
Industrial Society and Its Future.

IQ 167

>Single handedly BTFO's industrial society, leftists
>tech-modernist freaks still seething to this day