/lit/ - Literature

>>8549415

There was a clear eugenic aspect to Nietzsche's thinking though, but it wasn't really race-based. That said, Nietzsche clearly did think in 'race' terms too.

He thought the permanently 'sick' were a drain on society, to the point that they should be euthanized, and that we have gone too far astray from the Ancient Greek ideal that bodily good health/perfection MUST precede intellect/genius - as opposed to vice versa or, what's worse, the modern belief that both have nothing to do with one another.

He certainly believed the European races should mix, that there should be a Pan-European State, frequently (and positively) alludes to the fair-haired Aryans of yore. And so on, and so on.

All of which I do not consider to be an objection, however. Eugenics is one of modernity's few secular heresies, which can only be a good thing.

>>8525203

>The postmodern ethics of emotivism were born from Marx, Kant and Nietzsche.

1) Don't give Marx so much fucking credit.
2) The case for Kant being an emotivist would be shaky at best.