/lit/ - Literature

>>3758151
lel 2

>>3730254
Oh yea, it's definitely not the best thing out there and the person(s) who made it doesn't seem to know much about a few of the topics here like Daoism (no mention of "Taiping jing"), the Ubermensch (Thus Spoke Zarathustra isn't mentioned) or Fascism (fucking Evola? Seriously?). I'm sure they fucked up elsewhere but I'm not fluent in all of these styles and philosophies. I would actually ignore his definitions and recommendations entirely and just use it as a very basic "guide" to get a rough idea of what you may be interested in.

Someone who knows more should make a better one.

>>3715480
I think people are assuming this is just a new take on Dante's "Inferno" or something dumb like that, when it's just another Dan Brown puzzle adventure book with a classic artist/writer/whatever as the foundation, again (like he did with DaVinci).