[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19626704 [View]
File: 89 KB, 1000x1500, 61qqyBRTHYL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19626704

Is this book any good still or has the theory evolved since this book wrote about it?

>> No.19620914 [View]
File: 89 KB, 1000x1500, kalam.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19620914

Any books that refute the cosmological argument?

>Everything that begins to exist has a cause.
>The universe began to exist.
>Therefore, the universe has a cause.
>The universe has a cause.
>If the universe has a cause, then an uncaused, personal Creator of the universe exists who sans (without) the universe is beginningless, changeless, immaterial, timeless, spaceless and enormously powerful.
>Therefore, an uncaused, personal Creator of the universe exists, who sans the universe is beginningless, changeless, immaterial, timeless, spaceless and enormously powerful.

>> No.19546828 [View]
File: 89 KB, 1000x1500, 61qqyBRTHYL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19546828

qrd on this book?

>> No.19521709 [View]
File: 89 KB, 1000x1500, 61qqyBRTHYL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19521709

Is it still worth reading? The book, I mean; I know he still promotes the theory, but I'm not sure if he's further developed it in later books beyond this one.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]