/lit/ - Literature

Can someone explain the BB. and CC. and AA. designations in the Miller translation of PoS, and are they unique to that translation?

My best guess is that the BB. is in opposition to B, and so on, or at least there is some relation. But then you get DD. at the end and there is no D section. Pic is a different book of course.

I spent 15 minutes thinking nd my only conclusion is Heidegger justifies Marx's notion that philosophy should be for changing people's lives, I feel like I've made a mistake

>>22803786
hmm... i proc this
>you can't have a wife because your sister will seethe

seriously stop using people like this

Does Ligotti talk about schizophrenia? It might be time to start reading topics I can actually relate to. Or any other schizo lit. I have already read D&G.

>>22704096
as an entity: measure
as a property: actuality

books for comedy?

in as much as an object can be like another object to the extend it can support the same substantial end albeit being perceptually different, would Hegel say the appearance of a similar object is likely to have a similar end as an actual object? basically, is there any reason life on the sun is not possible but life on the moon is, for Hegel?

What isn't 'Appearance and Reality'(Bradley) titled 'Appearance and Actuality'? it seems more fitting. The separation of actuality from appearance is the substantial relation, although I'd have to research the second relation more.

>spreads to American and England through Germany
German-held colonial commodities for this feel?

Deleuze's book on cinema is the negation