/lit/ - Literature

>>12012014
Good answer.

>>10165883
>other people say that subverting the tradition is good for reasons, therefore I agree because I want a place in the "philosophical world"

You're a pretentious joke

>>6722415
>how do you suppose they aren't decent?
Written poorly, making poor arguments, outdated quickly, poor examples, etc.

I mean really.

>asking for someone to do your work for you is not having a conversation
Good thing I am not asking someone to do my work for me.

>rightly so
Well no, but go ahead. I am sure it makes you feel more secure in what you are saying.

>they will still give you information but they will make clear there is also no consensus
I guess that point flew over your head.

If something has already been argued to death and there is nothing more to get from it, it wont do much good to try a discussion on it. People will just point you to a place where the answer is.

If the topic has not been decided, like the value of a work that has just come out, it is worth discussion for a manifold of reasons.

In both cases, it is clear that asking the question itself is not a problem. Someone replying "go anywhere else for the answer" is a problem, because it is stupid. If you know where the answer is, then point to it. If you know there is no answer and have some opinion on the topic, give it. You clearly do not though so please do not.

>not sure this board is for you champ
Hiding behind the board is pretty pathetic, but again I am sure it makes you feel better so whatever.

>>6583281
I love you, anon.

I really do.