/lit/ - Literature

Reminder that pic related was painted the year Hitler was born, and that Hitler was literally summoned and activated by a Thulean mystic:

>Dietrich expressed his anticipation in a poem he wrote months before he first met Hitler. In the poem, Eckart refers to ‘the Great One’, ‘the Nameless One’, ‘Whom all can sense but no one saw’. When Eckart met Hitler, Eckart was convinced that he had encountered the prophesied redeemer.

>The two first met when Hitler gave a speech before the DAP membership in the winter of 1919. Hitler immediately impressed Eckart, who said of him "I felt myself attracted by his whole way of being, and very soon I realized that he was exactly the right man for our young movement."[15] It is probably Nazi legend that Eckart said about Hitler on their first meeting "That's Germany's next great man –one day the whole world will talk about him."

>Although Hitler did not mention Eckart in the first volume of Mein Kampf, after Eckart's death he dedicated the second volume to him,[25] writing that Eckart was "one of the best, who devoted his life to the awakening of our people, in his writings and his thoughts and finally in his deeds."[57] In private, he would admit Eckart's role as his mentor and teacher, and said of him in 1942: "We have all moved forward since then, that's why we don't see what [Eckart] used to be back then: a polar star. The writings of all others were filled with platitudes, but if he told you off: such wit! I was a mere infant then in terms of style."

>Hitler later told one of his secretaries that his friendship with Eckart was "one of the best things he experienced in the 1920s" and that he never again had a friend with whom he felt such "a harmony of thinking and feeling."

Consult this thread for quotes from The Young Hitler, by his childhood friend August Kubizek:
>>/lit/thread/S19335816
>[Hitler's mother] was deeply disturbed by her son's unusual nature, however proud she was at times of him. 'He is different from us,' she used to say."

>>22985684
Oh, and The Young Hitler I Knew:
>>/lit/thread/S19335816
>[Hitler's mother] was deeply disturbed by her son's unusual nature, however proud she was at times of him. 'He is different from us,' she used to say."

>Dietrich Eckart expressed his anticipation in a poem he wrote months before he first met Hitler. In the poem, Eckart refers to ‘the Great One’, ‘the Nameless One’, ‘Whom all can sense but no one saw’. When Eckart met Hitler, Eckart was convinced that he had encountered the prophesied redeemer.

>The two first met when Hitler gave a speech before the DAP membership in the winter of 1919. Hitler immediately impressed Eckart, who said of him "I felt myself attracted by his whole way of being, and very soon I realized that he was exactly the right man for our young movement."[15] It is probably Nazi legend that Eckart said about Hitler on their first meeting "That's Germany's next great man –one day the whole world will talk about him."

>Although Hitler did not mention Eckart in the first volume of Mein Kampf, after Eckart's death he dedicated the second volume to him,[25] writing that Eckart was "one of the best, who devoted his life to the awakening of our people, in his writings and his thoughts and finally in his deeds."[57] In private, he would admit Eckart's role as his mentor and teacher, and said of him in 1942: "We have all moved forward since then, that's why we don't see what [Eckart] used to be back then: a polar star. The writings of all others were filled with platitudes, but if he told you off: such wit! I was a mere infant then in terms of style."

>Hitler later told one of his secretaries that his friendship with Eckart was "one of the best things he experienced in the 1920s" and that he never again had a friend with whom he felt such "a harmony of thinking and feeling."

>>22957524
Reminder that pic related was painted the year Hitler was born, and that Hitler was literally summoned and activated by a Thulean mystic:

>Dietrich expressed his anticipation in a poem he wrote months before he first met Hitler. In the poem, Eckart refers to ‘the Great One’, ‘the Nameless One’, ‘Whom all can sense but no one saw’. When Eckart met Hitler, Eckart was convinced that he had encountered the prophesied redeemer.

>The two first met when Hitler gave a speech before the DAP membership in the winter of 1919. Hitler immediately impressed Eckart, who said of him "I felt myself attracted by his whole way of being, and very soon I realized that he was exactly the right man for our young movement."[15] It is probably Nazi legend that Eckart said about Hitler on their first meeting "That's Germany's next great man –one day the whole world will talk about him."

>Although Hitler did not mention Eckart in the first volume of Mein Kampf, after Eckart's death he dedicated the second volume to him,[25] writing that Eckart was "one of the best, who devoted his life to the awakening of our people, in his writings and his thoughts and finally in his deeds."[57] In private, he would admit Eckart's role as his mentor and teacher, and said of him in 1942: "We have all moved forward since then, that's why we don't see what [Eckart] used to be back then: a polar star. The writings of all others were filled with platitudes, but if he told you off: such wit! I was a mere infant then in terms of style."

>Hitler later told one of his secretaries that his friendship with Eckart was "one of the best things he experienced in the 1920s" and that he never again had a friend with whom he felt such "a harmony of thinking and feeling."

Consult this thread for quotes from The Young Hitler, by his childhood friend August Kubizek:
>>/lit/thread/S19335816
>[Hitler's mother] was deeply disturbed by her son's unusual nature, however proud she was at times of him. 'He is different from us,' she used to say."

Media and officials lie. Despite the problems in the US, standards of living have not reached bad. People are still houses, they have access to affordable food, they still work, the structure is still standing.

Only from a chaotic, broken systsm does a hero emerge to. For that to happen their must be the following:
>Normal people starving and dying in tens of thousands, through no fault of their own
>Hyperinflation, not like we have now but for a dozen eggs to cost $100
>Active civil war, not blm niggers wanting to not be treated like niggers
>A broken economy where nobody but the explotitive can profit
>Complete breakdowm of sexual and gender norms, to the point where open, passive acknowledgement is now the norm

Some of these are happening, some are starting to get worse. We may perhaps entering the beginning of a Weimar period, i hope we are, but i dl not think we are yet.

>>22858272
>Nazis were pagan
>Nazis were Christian

Words can not express how tired i am of your world-view and the dying morals you still hold to.

>>22830959
It was Western Man, the man of the Eveningland.

>>22644933
Great post.

Daily reminder that the most successful means of arranging society was purposefully removed from the Earth at the conclusion of the first European Civil War out of fear it would destroy Liberalism. The attempt to remake it resulted in the second Civil War of Europe that too threatened the entite continent and required Liberalism to make a deal with the devil, Communism, to defeat it.

>>22627131
Why do people think Theodore Kaczynski is in any way Right-Wing? He is an anti-state luddite with the idea that freedom is the ultimate goal.

Are we just simply assuming the following?
>Right = More Freedoms
>Left = Less Freesoms

>>22566113
>that the basis of aristocracy is success in military leadership
Success does not enter in to it. Simply the ability to get mem to follow you to war and prosecute one is sufficient. Wars are not won by who is more Aristocratic, further one can be a bad aristocrat, like any other position in society.

Further, I said historically it is true, all other trappings came after it. It even subverted it in places wherein you had aristocrats who were said to be such by virtue of wealth, education, or something else.

I state again, for simplicities sake: The only moral, virtuous and justifiable reason for the establishment of an aristocrat is martial leadership. Throughout history this was the case. Though many times it was not, and thus were not aristocratic in anything but empty name.

>>22561238
People seem incapable of seperating an authors personal views with what they wrote down. If an author write something and another group embodies it, one can not bitch and cry. Nietzsche and the National-Socialists are a good example. We all know he did not care for Nazis but to deny the Nazis were not, in part, reflected in aspects of work is just a idiocy.

>>22557020
Patterns in creativity should not be ignored. One side of the political spectrum discovered the objective standards of beauty that all art follows, while the other side creates things (not art) in subversion and refutation of these objective standards.

>Mein Kampf
>For My Legionaires
>The History Of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind

>>22518790
As i said, Faustian man is us and we are witnessing the end of our Culture. I deplore efforts to find a means to transpose dead ethics and world-view in to what i hope will be a new and greater Culture.

>>22518797
Literal deal with the Mephistopheles, Western Man's yearning for the beyond and what is out of his reach. Having contempt for one thing being taken out of its place does not equate to having hate for it in its proper place. The Faustian Culture-Man is in decline, let it go so in peace as the other 7 High Cultueres have. Do not drag up its bones and try and force life in to it.

e can not appreciate Western Literature without knowing the bible, you assume i hate it all, i do not. Just the repeater and doomed attempt to prolong its life.

Artist, Franz Von Stuck
Author, Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn

>Picrel is Wotan's Wild Hunt