/lit/ - Literature

>Want to read books on phone
>Decides to use OneDrive
>Says I need Library Card
>Too shy and introverted to go and get it

What do I do?

>>10643695
Me too man, but I was simply a retard at that time, so I don’t regret it, it couldn’t have been any other way

>Is there any unironic writing/lectures
>unironic

SINCERE OR UNSARCASTIC. THE WORDS YOU ARE TRYING TO CONVEY ARE SINCERE OR UNSARCASTIC.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS UNIRONY!!!!!

IRONY IS THE SUBVERSION OF EXPECTATED OF EVENTS OR SITUATIONS, PREDOMINANTLY BUT NECESSARILY TO AN OPPOSITE DEGREE.

YOU CAN'T SUBVERT SOMETHING YOU DON'T EXPECT TO HAPPEN.

I HAVE LESS THAN 20 POSTS ON /lit/ UNDER MY BELT AND YOU'RE MAKING WE WANT TO TAKE THAT BELT OFF AND UNSARCASTICALLY BEAT YOUR ASS WITH IT.

>>8675933
this has to be a troll

>>8048086
>high modernism
>white culture
STOP

>>7984469
Just do it you faggot fuck, I hate people like you so much, posts like this pisses me off so goddamn much, we should really begin punishing lazy piece of shit fucks like you with communal violence

FUCK

>I believe in identity

>>7429532
>that fucking cover
>>7429631
Also based Bjornson for for something a bit more obscure.

>>6941267
I just read the whole chat, but this
>but I could see all of the Rhetoric courses in the English department.
still seems true. Why is there a separate department for Rhetoric? There are classes on sexism, gender, class, colonization, minorities (latinos for example), new media, politics, historicality, etc. in the English department.

I still just don;t get it.

>>5809374
You are defending a made up woman.

I made that woman up you fuck. I know for a fact she is manipulative. You are beyond help.

>>5809377
>So you admit that the hypothetical in the OP doesn't support what the OP was asking?

No, you blind retard.

Read this. Then read it again. And again.
>You have a lack of reading comprehension and can't combine the rest of the OP to the scenario given in the OP.

You can dance around this all you want. It is completely apparent to everyone that you cannot for whatever reason take into context the scenario with the rest of what OP said, which is:
>Someone who somehow turns everything into an excuse to moan about their own problems. Someone who, although being self-sacrificing, seems disingenuous in how they constantly take responsibility for things knowing that nobody is blaming them for anything.
>This sort of self-righteous behaviour, being self-sacrificing while simultaneously being a cunt about it.

No one is saying that this type of person really must exist (though i'm sure everyone can give their anecdotes on how likely it would be).

We are describing a made up person. Get over it.

>>4217960
No, im not him. Hes another person.

>>4203139

>reading books