/lit/ - Literature

>>12135002
no, in fact it's morally wrong

I see a lot of people talk shit on him here, but can any of you actually formally refute this?

Or anything in The Moral Landscape for that matter?

reminder

When Harris solved ethics.

>>11945093
Then you haven't ever seen his threads. They are full of actual argumentation and usually get to be pretty damn long or even hit the bump limit.

His ideas are frankly laughable

>>11811102

>>11796798
shut up you stupid idiot

REMINDER. this is how you solve the is-ought problem.

>>11719754
for future sambo threads

Hume BTFO.

>>10854462
nothin personnel, theist

Is this a 'good enough' answer to Hume?

I would say that for practical reasons, it is.

>>10651976
Of course.

>>10651990
Stop shitting up the moral landscape with your depths of namefaggotry.

>>10580234
If I have a certain factual belief I don't see why not having that belief is immoral. I can see that putting gloves on before taking something out of the oven protects your hands but don't see what that has to do with morality, is pic related really convincing to you? Why should my hand not be burned?
>>10580352
Ok I asked myself that and though I can think of things I WANT to do (I do have various desires) I don't see what I SHOULD do. Where does that SHOULD come from. On introspection the only moral system that would approve of everything I want to do is Egoism.
>>10580377
So how do you get an "ought"? I haven't found any philosopher I have read on the subject convincing at all. Mention someone and we can discuss their ideas.
>>10580432
I never said to stop anything. I don't think people ought not talk about morality or believe there is Right and Wrong, like I said in the post I don't see how you can get any ought. I want to eat it, is morality just doing what I want? Why should I just do what I want. There are clouds, sometimes it rains, denying morality isn't the same thing as denying the rain. Denying "ought" isn't the same thing as denying "is". At least as far as I can see.
>>10580480
The first green arrow. I don't see how we can get to "ought".

t. OP

>>10578870

Where were you when Sam Harris BTFO David Hume?