/lit/ - Literature

>>18967245
>reading Socrates
I, too, enjoy reading philosophers who never wrote anything.

>>16207807
arguing with women is like arguing with children. even if you win you lose.
>twitter argument
lmao

>>15989629
we dont event double the amount of posts per poster wym?

>>14209687
>hard wrapping in 2019
>at about 64 characters nevertheless

>>10107205

I don't know about an argument from authority from a responding philosopher, but I can point out myself that there is a basic contradiction in his argument as well as any absurdist's argument, as can anyone with a basic understanding of logic. he argues that there are no "absolutes" in the universe. however, for this to be true, it would be absolute that there are no absolutes, thus, forming a paradox. of course, one could argue that a paradox existing falls into the realm of absurdity, but at the same time there comes no reason to attempt to justify absurdism logically as you are denying logical positivism.
>I know that I cannot know
deep