/lit/ - Literature

>>17998982
There is a considerable improbability that women are capable of love. Likewise, there is a considerable improbability that men are actually capable of loving women for any duration beyond that which accompanies the refractory. Either the man is shackled by priapic chains, uses the woman as a vessel for egoism, or treats them like a bipedal labrador: the product of their intimacy is repugnant. Incidently, I am attracted to virtue—that which is scarcely observable in the fairer sex.

One would think that the seemingly increased prevalence of homosexual males in contemporary human society would assauge my transcendental desire and deliver unto me an object for my love. Your post, though, brings one unfortunate fact to my attention and shows me that human society does indeed possess something unnatural: for while homosexuality is evident in nature, faggots are not.

>be you
>be a contemporary skeptic
>have never once (1ce) thought about individual ontology, begin at "...I am."
>presume that the metaphysical is more nonsensical than the physical
Many such cases. Sad.

>>17437586