/lit/ - Literature

>>11823693
The whole purpose of an anonymous image board is to allow freedom of speech no matter how retarded said speech is. That's why Nazis, Commies, and Libertarians are allowed to discuss their absolute bottom of the barrel literature here. Its not about the discussion being good, intelligent, productive, etc. It's about the discussion being allowed.

If you want filtered or focused discussion you have literally any and every other website on the internet to choose from.

>>11252039
>individual freedom
>inalienable rights

>>8522706
It's not that that that didn't happen, it's that to begin with realization isn't a thing.

>>8441642
I suppose an approximation of what a 'spook' is, memeing aside, would be a social construct. Part of what Stirner wrote about was not letting these spooks take control of your life and lead to act against your own interest. Someone willing to die for their country is an example of someone who is spooked.

>immoral

>>8188721
Sounds like you need the Spookbuster more than any of us, anon.

Read The Ego and It's Own.

>>8186258
>Similar apocalyptic fears might have driven Jürgen Habermas in his younger years to condemn the "absurdity of Stirner's fury" with furious words -- and since that time never to mention Stirner again, even in texts about Left Hegelianism. Theodor Adorno, who saw himself driven back at the end of his philosophical career to the -- pre-Stirnerian -- "standpoint of Left Hegelianism," once cryptically remarked that Stirner was the only one who really "let the cat out of the bag," but in no way referred to him in any of his works. For his part, Peter Sloterdijk took note of none of this, only shaking his head at the idea that the "brilliant" Marx had "grown angry in many hundreds of pages about those, after all, simple thoughts of Stirner."

>Karl Marx: like Nietzsche's, his reaction to Stirner deserves to be emphasized here, owing to its era-forming impact. Marx believed as late as the summer of 1844 that Feuerbach was "the only one who had achieved a true theoretical revolution." The appearance of »Der Einzige« in October, 1844, shook this outlook to the core, because Marx very clearly experienced the depth and implications of Stirner's criticism. While others, including Engels, initially admired Stirner, Marx saw from the beginning in him an enemy who needed to be annihilated.