/lit/ - Literature

>>18259006
Some people have criticized F. Gardner for writing like an edgy ESL twelve year old. You should probably be the judge of that yourself. pic-completely-related.

I would note how the writing itself is terribly constructed. With grammatical errors on nearly every page, and the most odd comma placement I have ever seen. But to focus on these technical errors distracts from how fundamentally flawed this novel actually is. Even with the world's most accomplished Grammarian, no amount of technical edits could ever salvage this train wreck. Again, part 1 was mostly just a poorly written goosebumps ripoff, but part 2 is where F. Gardner's demented (I mean genius) storytelling shines

>>18258756
Some people have criticized F. Gardner for writing like an edgy ESL twelve year old. You should probably be the judge of that yourself. pic-completely-related.

I would note how the writing itself is terribly constructed. With grammatical errors on nearly every page, and the most odd comma placement I have ever seen. But to focus on these technical errors distracts from how fundamentally flawed this novel actually is. Even with the world's most accomplished Grammarian, no amount of technical edits could ever salvage this train wreck. Again, part 1 was mostly just a poorly written goosebumps ripoff, but part 2 is where F. Gardner's demented (I mean genius) storytelling shines