[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20460878 [View]
File: 72 KB, 576x391, fisherian.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20460878

Furthermore, women intellectually are inferior to men this is attributed to male variability, there are exponentially more men with higher IQs then women. To try and integrate women into positions males traditionally did contradicts the thousands of years of natural selection that men and women underwent. Giving women equal rights with men ultimately creates a miserable gynocentric society where high rates of single motherhood, mental illness, promiscuity, degeneracy, mass consumerism, unhealthy families, and degeneracy becomes ubiquitous. Furthermore, intersexual selection (female choice) favours immutable sexually dimorphic traits such as height and looks, where women chase the top 20% of males. This can be explained using Fisherian Runaway where female choice would favour sexually dimorphic traits rather then intrasexual selection where traits that conferred a survival advantage would be passed on. The former is eugenic and encourages the growth of civilisation, female choice would make sure only sexually dimorphic traits would be passed on – if not for the fact that when women are infertile at old they find a naive man to extract resources from. So yes women’s rights will halt human progress and feminism is a blight on humanity that contradicts basic biology. A new study that found IQ scores have being lowering dramatically decades proves the dysgenic nature of free female sexual selection.

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1718793115

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]