[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.19306918 [View]
File: 9 KB, 225x225, AFEC04D7-BF6E-48AB-9074-3351E23D1426.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19306918

>>19305574
Socrates belonged, in his origins, to the lowest folk: Socrates was
rabble. We know, we can still see for ourselves, how ugly he was. But
ugliness, which in itself is an objection, was among the Greeks virtually
a refutation. Was Socrates Greek in the first place? Ugliness is often
enough the expression of interbreeding, of a development thwarted by
interbreeding. In other cases it appears as a development in decline.
Forensic anthropologists tell us that the typical criminal is ugly: mon-
strum in fronte, monstrum in animo [monster in the face, monster in the
soul]. But the criminal is a décadent. Was Socrates a typical criminal?—
At any rate this wouldn’t contradict that well-known judgment of a
physiognomist which sounded so offensive to Socrates’ friends. A visi-
tor who knew about faces, when he passed through Athens, said to
Socrates’ face that he was a monstrum—that he contained all bad vices
and cravings within him. And Socrates simply answered: “You know me, sir!”

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]