/lit/ - Literature

no it's not

>>8307024
>voting
I can't be wrong if I don't voice an opinion

>>5920614
Science is an amazing tool to understand the universe. However, we've come to deify it, and attribute far more to science than it can support. It is important to utilise it for situations or problems which require, or can be solved with, empirical answers, but nothing more.

>>4748945
>Link: http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/Beowulf/axioms/axioms/node4.html

I think you have discovered the worst thing ever to exist.

Possible Alternatives:
-- Read "The Republic"
-- Travel to India.

But seriously if you read enough Philosophy you're still going to need to discuss it with others. That's critical and exceedingly rare in the United States.

Hinduism deserves a medal for developing the most effective and airtight method of social control ever to exist.

Tough call. If the fantasy has strong mythological components and doesn't lose appeal over time I would side with fantasy.

Science fiction has a less timeless quality to it: IN THE YEAR 1999 WE WILL BE ON THE MOON. LOS ANGELES IS A WARZONE, AND ONLY ONE ATOMIC CYBORG FROM VENUS CAN SHOW US THE WAY.

THIS

IS

ROBOTOTOM

>>4719761
>underage wikipedia scholars

I will see your underage wikipedia scholars and further suggest that these individuals are:

1. From /pol/
2. Poorly educated
3. Likely nazi/right wing
4. American