/lit/ - Literature

>>20646918
>What would you recommend?
Guenon (pbuh) of course. Start with Crisis.
>it seems some of the Theosophists take liberties with material
They were mostly the century-old version of witchtok larpers with crystals and, while I do enjoy reading Blavatsky just for kicks, you really shouldn't take that stuff too seriously lest you fall prey to counterinitiation. Treat it like you'd treat your average /x/phile who made a thread that's both absurdly retarded and still a fun read. Guenon has a whole book dedicated to btfoing them

>>20543419
Last time this happened I lied and claimed it was Blavatsky. I actually see her as a total joke after reading Guenon's (pbuh) takedown on Theosophists and haven't read any of her work at all, but she was the first female author that came to mind and thinking for too long would have made me look autistic. Which I probably am, but I don't want to look the part.

>>20543423
based af