/lit/ - Literature

>>3545834

It's alright, old egg. You can spill the beans. We know you're not at Oxbridge or St. Edinburgh already.

>>3500613

That extra 'o' will be your undoing, pipsqueak. More generally, I think we ought to ban people who don't appreciate Shakespeare, in accordance with Lord Bloom's wishes.

Not for our Bard? You're barred.

"Don't do any of this!" - people who're only briefly remembered for telling other people what not to do.

>>3364433

I'd be seriously concerned that they just used Google translate.

>>3237707

Bally good testing, old egg. You've earned your morning milk-and-two. Are us Brits the only holly gaggle not standardising?

I absolutely know that feel, bro.

>>3150737

But our upper classes top yours, by a country whatsit.

Never heard of it.

>mfw I read the the description.

>>2688188

YOU IDIOT, that's LARRY DAVID, not LARRY KING! WHY would LARRY KING be a JEWISH COMEDIAN and not a CURRENT AFFAIRS broadcaster who MAY OR MAY NOT BE DEAD, I forget, YOU BIG SILLY?!

>mfw this thread
Come on, guys. What the hell does this have to do with literature?

No mention of Italian literature, thus far.

>>2536911

Jolly good show, old bean. There's a special place in heaven for people who follow their passions. Oh, no... Hang on, that's hell. Still, commendations aplenty!

>>2532552
>a painting of Byron
>Lord Byron
>one of the most famous poets of all time
It's exactly the same as not recognizing a painting of Shakespeare.

It's not a bad thing, you're being brainwashed by bulldykes.

>>2450587
Alright.

You don't read books and you imagine anyone could find anything you ever say interesting? Fascinating.