/lit/ - Literature

>>11829120
>Stalin literally couldn't eliminate markets and he knew it.
And Stalin considered it a big problem to be fixed while Khrushchev and co wanted more markets.
>Exactly why its a retarded ideology, that you have to have the whole world accept it before it can work
There is nothing retarded about it. That only means it is going to be more difficult.
>Do you really not understand how investing is a feature of markets?
You don't need markets (which consist of Buyers and Sellers. i.e two parties) when one organization (the Communist Party) says to the scientists under them to work on and research computers.

>>11829121
>Britain did the exact opposite in India and shut down their free ability to produce textiles.
I just used textiles as an example. In any case, India was under the rule of the British East India Company since 1757. A capitalist entity.

>>11829123
A famine is still a famine