/lit/ - Literature

>>12921462
>a kind of prismatics - and by this i mean a theory of postmodernity that can recognize relativism as historically necessary but not fundamentally, absolutely true - is required. it leans a little on Wilber - i'm okay with him - but also on just the general sense of wanting to understand postmodernity as still being a phenomenon within modernity itself, as a commentary on Marx, Nietzsche, Hegel, and a few others. real postmodernity begins when we can finally have something more than irony and simulation.
This is beautiful anon and I agree 100%. Where do I start with Wilber? Also what exactly do you mean by applied post modernism?

>>12922318
i dont watch anime