/lit/ - Literature

>>20503064
>You didn't even do something as basic as skim the Wikipedia article for the Holocaust before deciding you didn't believe in it.
>he gets his information from wikipedia
Embarrassing.

>I already told you that modern crematoriums are trying to create pleasant-looking ashes with no identifiable remains left.
And I already told you that in order for your argument to work you'd need to cremate a body down to the bones in 15 minutes. Is that possible on 80 year old equipment or are you going to dodge the question?

>I am not a historian. Probably there is someone who would be able to answer your question, but it isn't me. That doesn't mean it's unreasonable for me to hold this belief.
>i have no idea what i'm talking about but i was taught this in school and i dare not question the narrative or people will think i'm bad so i'm going to stick to my beliefs even though i'm being hammered over the head with irrefutable evidence

>Here are some lists of mass grave locations and articles about the discovery of new ones (oh, but I suppose they are actually forged)

>https://www.ushmm.org/online/hsv/source_view.php?SourceId=32534
>446 names out of 6 million

>https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-16657363
>ignores previous image where treblinka mass graves are debunked

This is embarrassing. Did you google 'mass graves holocaust' and scramble to copy/paste the first results? I almost feel bad for how brainwashed you are. Maybe you'll reflect on this later but I doubt it.

>>20503073
>No we also have names because the nazis were fucking ocd, they literally made it easy for the world to gather evidence against their crimes against humanity
Very interesting. Then there would definitely be a paper trail for orders of the extermination of jews, right? And there would be documentation for how they did it, you know, because they were OCD and kept amazing records. Please produce those. Oh, and produce the 6 million names.