/lit/ - Literature

>>12649588
Don't you have to prove the existence of this "positive value". I wouldn't call the satiation of wants and needs a net positive but a positive movement closer to 0.

>>12593604
And here it is

>>12591945
>Brainletar

He does more to harm the cause than further it to be honest. I am the ultimate antinatalist thinker.

>>12570960
feel free to rein them back in

>>12554582
>siring young

>>12541445
Better for whom? Thee person-affecting problem cuts both ways. Except in my improved calculus.

>>12503398
You're absolutely right OP. Here I fixed Brainletar's asymmetry. This also doesn't run into the "person-affecting" problem if we consider the columns to represent different realities or worlds as opposed to the potential individual himself.

>>12500547
Nigger couldn't even get asymmetry right.

>>12494501
That's where your wrong, bucko.

Name a more objective moral principle than antinatalism.

>>12380394

>>12377908
>>12375701