/lit/ - Literature

>>18655941
it's OK to admit you don't know anything anon. no one's going to judge

>>18656097
>>18656124
>noo you can't talk about one of the most influential economists of all time

>>18656379
poverty isn't determined by having access to more use-values. it doesn't matter what whiz-bang tech exists if people have to work 80 hours per week to survive

>>18656508
>while my income is something I worked for and either agreed to be paid through a wage or gained through my own ingenuity
keep telling yourself that wagie

>>18656582
>In reality the workers get about 90% of profits, only 10% goes to the capital owners
this is just wrong. workers don't get any of the profit
you also don't know what the organic composition of capital is, or how it affects the rate of exploitation vs the rate of profit
>a single employer can easily give a job - and provide a livelihood - for hundreds of workers
incredibly class cucked

>>18657069
no. the bourgeois state serves bourgeois interests, like maintaining private property and keeping the proles just content enough to not revolt