/lit/ - Literature

>>12663200

>>12582533
Yah, only a hundred years after everyone else did.

>>12431830
>Men living with other men produce more conflicts and so more art?
I think we need the tao people back to clarify what the balance in "the force" actually says about good art. I do appreciate his romanticism and am probably missing some grand irony. I'll have t read him I guess.

>>12368854
>When they share a common self interest.
That interest has never been self motivated. Prove me wrong. And if not, study more.
---
Patriotism expands onto your affiliates as is legitimate to your prismatic-self. What goes in to making this legitimate is varied and outside of your control. Biological and environmental, unconscious biases, media determination. You cannot have a self interest without it being shared in some sort of field of communication, some media zone. You can choose this one you have, but it will not reflect a freedom that I would call free. You would have to negate to show freedom, to critique and destroy in order to show that even the creative nothing as Stirnerites have it, is a very dull something loaded with knowledge and necessitated by endless variables. This may be too materialistic for you, but the idealism pathway here is much, much more souldestroying, aint I right St. Francis?

>>12352142
I think it might. I think that is actual the only legitifing source that gives hold to a long lasting value. It is magic and insanity that hold shit together, and probably a bit of sleeping around.

>>12310101
what about if love is the prob and I don't want to fix that, but I could really use the cash? Just think of a pyramid and a donkey and you'll get the rest if you pay me cold hard cash. Also, what if it's also a detective novel? Who Done Me Good?

>>12295692