/lit/ - Literature

>>10528633
Allow me to walk you through your chains of decisions (each worse then the next) that lead to this blunder.

Exhibit A:
my post here >>10527023
where - for the first time in your life I presume- you were divinely touched by the term "occams razor".
Then follows your (?) post >>10528372 where you demand justification for lemmas based on axioms.
Alternativel this was you >>10528484 which is just as ridiculous.

In any case, we finally reach the crescendo of cretinism (crescinism?) with this anti-masterpiece: >>10528528
namely the sentence >Go ahead and justify Occam's Razor.

As if Occams razor was included in the axioms that we were talking about and which you asked me to justify, ignoring that axioms are the ones doing the justifying.

Leading to your present situation >>10528633 where you look like an utter fool in public and full view of the rest of this esteemed Nepalesian gardening forum.

Now. Can you maybe tell me where you thought you started to err? (Protip: It starts with "your" and ends with "conception")