/lit/ - Literature

>>23257475
>Nāgārjuna is probably the most underwhelming Buddhist author/philosopher to read.
>>23257759
>Nāgārjuna's logic just isn't as rigorous as Aristotle's and at times he engages in fallacies.
Which books would you recommend that I study to understand the Buddhist confessions of momentariness, mereological nihilism, and nominalism? Many years ago, the Buddhists recommended that I study Nāgārjuna, Vasubandhu, Saṃghabhadra, Dignāga, and Dharmakīrti after studying Plato, Aristotle, Confucius, and Epicurus.

>>23249664
The self does not persist, but the causal series of impersonal, impermanent psychophysical elements that the self is not do.
web.archive.org/web/20020603010533/http://www4.bayarea.net/~mtlee/
web.archive.org/web/20031220231547/http://www.drba.org/dharma/
web.archive.org/web/20071102120620/http://www.sutrasmantras.info/sutra0.html
web.archive.org/web/20040718233929/http://www.acmuller.net/yogacara/

web.archive.org/web/20020603010533/http://www4.bayarea.net/~mtlee/
web.archive.org/web/20031220231547/http://www.drba.org/dharma/
web.archive.org/web/20071102120620/http://www.sutrasmantras.info/sutra0.html
web.archive.org/web/20040718233929/http://www.acmuller.net/yogacara/
How is Plato related to Buddha? How is Aristotle related to Buddha? How is Confucius related to Buddha? How is Epicurus related to Buddha?

Know nothing about Buddhism but I'd like to learn about it. What books should I read? Any charts?